Monday, June 15, 2009

Cricket’s glorious 5 centuries!

© Shailesh Nigam, Varun Khanna (for respective articles)

There are billions of followers of cricket the world over, many of them self-confessed fanatics. Yet, very few know about the origin & evolution of cricket. In this article, I try to put forth what I learned based on my own knowledge & some research over the Internet.

While a lot has been done to trace cricket’s origins, there is no final conclusion. It is commonly believed that the game was invented by English shepherds to while away their time while grazing the sheep. They used to use farm equipment & wooden sticks to hit a round-shaped object made of wood or stone… winner being the one who hit it farthest.

The first written evidence of a game known as ‘creag’ played by Prince Edward at Kent is in 1301, which could place cricket’s history back to 7 centuries. However, it is merely speculated that this was cricket and there is no concrete evidence of the same. For all purposes of reported history, cricket originated as a sport in England in the early 16th century, way back in the Tudor era, sometime earlier than the beginning of Queen Elizabeth I’s reign (1558 – 1603).

The earliest definite reference to the term ‘cricket’ is in 1598, when it was called ‘creckett’. The reference is in a court case about a sport played by the students of the Royal Grammar School, Guildford around 1550 (whew, that is over 450 years ago). The word is assumed to have been derived from the Old English word ‘cryce’ meaning a stick/staff. Way back then, the cricket (or cryce) bats were shaped liked bent staffs (like hockey sticks), and the ball used to be rolled on the ground for the batsman to hit. The bats continued in this form until they evolved over 2 centuries (!!!) later in 1760, when bowlers started pitching the ball instead of rolling it towards the batsmen. This meant that the ball came bouncing towards the batsmen, and this necessitated the introduction of a straighter bat, the kind that is used today.

By the early 17th century, around 1610, the sport had evolved to the level of a contest, where inter-parish matches were being held. The game’s popularity kept growing through the 17th century; however, it was popular mostly in southern England and it still remained a villagers’ game. But, by the end of the century, things changed. The rich started patronizing the sport and forming their own ‘Select XIs’, on whom they placed bets (who says ‘Super Selector’ is new?), and this helped it become an organized sport played for high stakes all across England.

The first proof of cricket’s popularity comes from a newspaper report about an 11-players-a-side match that was played in Sussex in 1697. The fact that a newspaper found this worthy-enough of being written about in ‘holier-than-thou journalism days’ also suggests that the sport had assumed a fairly important status. As early as 1707, cricket had become prominent in London, with teams coming to play from afar, which attracted huge crowds & betters.

The Marylebone Cricket Club (MCC) was founded in 1787, when the Lord’s Cricket Ground (named after Thomas Lord, a professional bowler who was encouraged by his club-mates to find & run a private cricketing venue within easy distance of London), the mecca of cricket, was formally opened. However, the first ground was not in the same place as the current ground and Lord’s has been moved twice till it reached its current home. Though it was not the first cricket club in England, MCC quickly assumed the position of the most premier club and the custodian of the Laws of Cricket.

By the end of the 18th century, cricket had become so popular that it was accorded the status of the national sport of England, and the expansion of the British Empire led to cricket being played by the Englishmen in other countries. The game became well established in Australia, New Zealand, the Caribbean Islands, India, South Africa and North America (yes, North America – even though it is not a very popular sport in that continent anymore). In fact, you’d be surprised to learn that the first ever international cricket match was played in 1844, between the United States of America & Canada (although neither has been accorded a Test-playing nation status ever)!!!

By the mid-19th century, international matches begun to gain importance. In 1859, the English Team went on their first overseas tour to North America (see picture below). In 1862, the English made their first tour of Australia, and in 1876-77, played the first Test Match at Melbourne Cricket Ground, Australia. The term ‘Ashes’ came into existence shortly, due to the cricketing rivalry between the English & the Australians in 1882, when at The Oval, Australia beat England on an English ground for the first time, and a newspaper wrote that English cricket had died, and “the body will be cremated and the ashes taken to Australia”. Within the same decade, international cricket expanded further when South Africa became the 3rd nation to play international cricket, when they played England in 1888-89.


The English Cricket Team aboard their ship on the tour to USA & Canada, 1859

With cricket’s growing footprint, a global governing body was needed, and the International Cricket Council (ICC) was formed. Originally founded as the Imperial Cricket Conference by England, Australia & South Africa, it came into existence exactly a century ago on 15th June, 1909. It was renamed the International Cricket Conference in 1965, and took up its current name in 1989.

The game has gained huge popularity over these 100 years, and today ICC’s headquarters have moved away from England to Dubai, highlighting the widespread impact that other nations have had on cricket. Today, over a 100 nations (that’s half the world by nation-count, and probably half the world even by population count) play the sport, and the popularity is growing. That’s cricket’s impact for you – 5 great centuries, and getting better!

Thursday, June 11, 2009

So far so good!

© Shailesh Nigam, Varun Khanna (for respective articles)

The T20 Worldcup tournament moves to phase two today. The first phase was largely to accommodate upcoming nations, to allow them to show what they are made of and stake their claims to be amongst the elite. These preliminary rounds are bound to throw some surprises and this time there was no exception. Netherlands almost created an upset but England and Pakistan proved too good to succumb. Bangladesh however, wasn't so lucky and allowed Ireland to sneak through to next round. Australia may want to consider themselves unlucky, but they really didn't have enough fire power to even cross the first hurdle. The fact that they were in the pool of death didn't help either.

For India, the situation is so far so good. Two matches, two wins and Aussies are back home. They've found a suitable replacement for Viru in the top order and Zak has had a good outing yesterday. The only worry is that the team hasn't been tested fully yet. Wonder, how they will handle a 30 for 3 in five or 60 for 6 in eight! They are yet to face and survive the bowling from Murlis, Ajanthas and Daniels of the world and they are yet to face Gayles, Jayasuriyas, AB Deviliers and Mccullams fire with the bat. Six batsmen and 5 specialist bowlers seems to be their mantra till now. Dhoni clearly feels that the regular bowlers are a necessity in this tournament, otherwise there is no reason not to go with 7 batsmen in what is considered to be an out and out batsman's game.

Another dirt of concern surrounding Indian team is this whole Sehwag issue. I think it was necessary to take Viru to London even if his injury was known. At that time Indian team didn't have any option at the top. Plan A - Search for someone to replace him in the warm-up games and if replacement is found, send Viru back to bring in his replacement (as allowed by ICC rules). Plan B - If a suitable replacement could not be found then retain Sehwag, after all even a 60%-70% of Viru is good enought to demolish opposition mentally if not on the the field. Now that they have successfully experimented with Rohit at the top, Indians can send him back and get a replacement. Mission accomplished!!! Well done!!! Wonder what is the fuss about!!! The Indian Media should either back out or support the Indian team in the testing times ahead. Enough damage has been done in garb of "Indian fans need to know...".

India, Srilanka, South Africa and New Zealand appear to be the four well rounded teams for now. While Pakistan, West Indies and England will have to lift their game several notches if they want to harbour any thoughts to reach the semis. Ireland, should just feel happy to be enjoying company of these teams and make the best of three more matches they are getting to play. All the games in Super eight guarantee entertainment, but the T20 format also guarantees uncertainties. One only hopes and prays that the best team wins!

Varun Khanna

Saturday, June 6, 2009

Dutch courage humbles the English in their own backyard

© Shailesh Nigam, Varun Khanna (for respective articles)

Dutch courage – what is it exactly? The term has its origins in naval warfare. In the old days, the Dutch navy was feared by all other navies because of the courage it demonstrated in fighting a sea battle. This was especially true during the Anglo-Dutch wars of the 17th & 18th centuries, when Netherlands & Britain were bitter rivals, and the Dutch were particularly dreaded by the British navy, and the Dutch East India Company was forever taking on the British East India Company in atrociously daring attacks. It was rationalized that such an attack could only be undertaken by a drunk man, who was not scared of anything at all. And thus, the phrase Dutch courage came into existence as a slang for courage gained from alcoholic intoxication.

Well yesterday, the Dutch proved once again that they have absolutely no fear of how strong the opposition may be, and especially Britain needs to be extremely wary when facing them. Were the Dutch cricketers drunk before the match or not, I do not know. What I can safely say is that they would definitely by drunk on the success of beating England, and Pakistan, who are next in their line, must be a worried lot.

Like Varun had written yesterday, predicting a winner in Twenty20 match is not an easy task. It is akin to predicting the future. There is only one problem though… the difficult aspect about predicting the future is that… uhm, it’s pretty difficult to predict. And as was demonstrated yesterday, this holds equally true for cricket. Or, at least, Twenty20 cricket.

Well, the tournament has begun with a huge upset, and that is the beauty of this game. One can never say who will win on a given day. Though, I also notice a trend thus far – most winners in practice matches and in the opener too are teams batting second. So, maybe, just after the toss, we can predict a winner most of the times. Hope Dhoni notices this too, and wins all tosses for India… starting with the one today, or we might witness yet another upset.

Friday, June 5, 2009

Let the Biggest Chhadi Cricket begin...

© Shailesh Nigam, Varun Khanna (for respective articles)

If the ODI was termed as Pyjama Cricket, Chhadhi cricket seems to be an appropriate title for the T20 format. And the biggest tournament to celebrate this form of cricket begins today at the mecca of cricket...

Conventionally, at the start of any tournament of this stature, in any sport, there are bound to be a few favourites. Specially in a team sport, there is a fair and close to accurate prediction of who will emerge the champion. The basis of the prediction being - quality of players, their form, recent results and playing conditions. However, if one was to look at T20 history (whatever little we have), whether in previous worldcup or the two IPLs, the champions were hardly a team which fulfilled the above criteria. India started as underdogs in the WC in South Africa, who thought Rajasthan Royals will bring glory in IPL1... Deccan Chargers?? Need I say more...

The argument is that, well there is indeed some trend... unlikeliest team is likely to win. Now if an unlikely team is likely, then it is not a unlikely team! Isn't it? Or have I managed to confuse you...?

But the fact of the matter is that in a game of cricket which is as short in length as chhaddi, one really can't predict. One player out of 22 on field in a given match can win (or for that matter loose) a match for you. He doesn't necessarily be in the best of form lately nor does he have to be a star in his own right (ask Joginder Sharma). So if anyone claims to predict the winner accurately, he/she may do it at his/her own peril. No doubt that one would want India to win, but without a prediction.

Various aspects of this shorter version of the game are hugely debated. A purists may feel that this is not cricket at all and that the rigour and persistence of a test match is the real test of supremacy. The others may feel the shorter version is more enjoyable, guarantees a result and respects time. All arguments and the counters thereof are accepted and respected, to each his own! But the amazing thing is that Cricket has always existed in multiple forms. The game of bat and ball, where runs are scored and wickets fall, exists in much more varied forms than probably any other sport. Consider this...

A toddler grows a little, barely having learnt to walk, is gifted a plastic bat and a plastic ball (which makes more sound than bounce). His loving father hands over the bat to the kid and rolls the ball towards him on the ground. Almost instinctively, the little one tries to hit it with the bat, preventing the ball to hit an invisible wicket behind him. At times the ball does roll behind him and a father smiles silently within for having taken a wicket. It is cricket in one form.

Then, once this kid gets a little older, he plays with the bouncy rubber ball and make shift wooden bat... probably the tool used for washing clothes in good old days. The ball too, spins like a serpent with a tiny tweak of fingers while bowling underarm. This cricket is played on terraces without a team. You contest alone, score your individual runs trying to beat four others. Basic rule is same, you stop batting once you are out... although the manner in which you can get out are far too many than the conventional cricket. One tip and one hand catch is out, you hit the ball outside the terrace is out, the ball hits you three times on your leg is out and many more. This is another form of cricket for you.

Then there is one form of cricket which we played much to the annoyance of our Mothers. Cricket was played inside your bedroom or drawing room, usually when it was raining outside, ironically keeping your thirst for cricket unquenched, or in summer vacations when it was too hot for you to step outside. You hit the bed and it is four, but if you hit the glass table you are out. You hit the TV and you stop playing. There you go... that was cricket, wasn't it?

Of course you would remember your school cricket, which in itself was played under various formats. Those games in the recess for which you happily skipped your meal, or the one played in the 'games' period. Format & rules adjusted for time, number of players, availability of a bat... so and so forth.

Around this time, you get inducted to a leather ball and other equipment which becomes necessary with it. There is a giant leap in the way you start playing now. The format now is more of T20 that we see played internationally. 20-25 overs matches, players from batting side doing the umpiring, the just-unjust decisions and the scoring fiascoes. This format is usually same (or rather similar) unless you go on to play professionally with a club, state, country etc. The corporate tournaments also follow the same format...

One cannot imagine any other sport followed in so many different formats. The most popular sport in the world today is football (or soccer as it is called in some parts) and the only variations that are possible in the game is adjustment of duration and number of players... that's it! Now how's that!

Today, as another chapter in the newest form of international cricket is added, I feel great to be a proud follower of this game, in each of it's shade. The nuances attached with the rules, conflicts associated with use and lack of technology, the differences acceptability of formats at top level and all those controversies which are integral part of this game, which invokes nothing but passion.

Long live Cricket!!! I love this game!!! And may the best team win!!!

Varun Khanna